Technical due diligence
For investors, acquirers, or leadership evaluating an existing system.
Before you commit budget and months to a technical direction, get an outside opinion from engineers who don't have a stake in which stack you choose. We review technical plans, existing systems, and vendor proposals, and tell you honestly what we see, including when the honest answer is that your current plan is solid. This isn't a sales pitch disguised as consulting, since we're not trying to win the implementation work that follows. You get a written assessment you can act on or hand to stakeholders, not just a conversation that evaporates once the call ends.
Architecture decisions made early are expensive to unwind later: the wrong database, an over-engineered setup for a five-person team, or a monolith that won't scale when it needs to. We review technical plans and existing systems and tell you honestly what we see.
This isn't a sales pitch disguised as consulting. Sometimes the outcome is "your plan is solid, proceed." Sometimes it's a specific list of what will break and when. Either way, you get a real assessment before you're committed.
For investors, acquirers, or leadership evaluating an existing system.
An honest assessment of your current or proposed system design.
Whether custom development is actually the right call for your situation.
Where your system needs to go, and in what order, without over-engineering for problems you don't have yet.
Sometimes the problem isn't the code. It's how the team is working.
A document you can actually act on or share with stakeholders.
We review actual code and documentation, not just a conversation about the system. Findings are grounded in what's really there. That means reading the codebase, architecture diagrams, and infrastructure configuration directly, not relying solely on what a team says it built. We interview the people who actually work in the system day to day, since the gap between documentation and reality is usually where the real risk lives. Findings are written up with specific, actionable recommendations ranked by risk and cost, not a vague list of concerns, and we're available afterward to answer questions as you act on them.
No, architecture consulting is a standalone engagement. If you want us for implementation after, great; if not, that's fine too.
Yes, that's most of what this engagement is for.
Typically 1-2 weeks depending on system size and documentation quality.
Yes, all our engagements, especially reviews of existing systems, are NDA-first by default.
Then that's exactly what we'll tell you: a clean bill of health is a legitimate, useful outcome, and we're not incentivized to manufacture problems.
Yes, this is a common use case: an independent read on whether a proposed scope, timeline, and architecture are realistic before you commit.
Get a response within one business day
Whether you need a brand-new build, a redesign of something that's already live, or a second opinion on a project another vendor left behind, our in-house engineering team scopes the work honestly, keeps you updated sprint by sprint, and stays reachable after launch instead of disappearing once the invoice is paid. Fill in the quick form and we'll reply within one business day, or book a free 30-minute architecture review if you'd rather talk it through first. No obligation, no sales pitch.